Back home   |   Bookmark   |   Start page   |   Site map    
Services
News
Channels
Home & Family
Leisure
Technology
Business
Science
Site Search
Free email




What makes mars magnetic?

TheAllINeed.com
(NC&T/ESF) So how have these rocks hung onto their magnetic directions and what do they tell us about Mars? Strangely, the answer to these questions might be sitting here on Earth.

Most continental rocks on Earth align their magnetic moments with the current magnetic field – they are said to have 'induced' magnetism. "I consider induced rocks to have 'Alzheimers'. These are the rocks that forgot where they were born and how to get home," explains Suzanne McEnroe from the Geological Survey of Norway at a European Science Foundation, EuroMinScI conference near Nice, France this year.

However, not all of Earth's continental rocks have an induced magnetization. Some rocks stubbornly refuse to swing with the latest magnetic field, and instead keep hold of the direction they were born with. These rocks are said to have a remanent magnetization.

McEnroe and her colleagues have been studying some of Earth's strongest and oldest remanent magnetic rocks, to find out why they have such good memories. Understanding these rocks may give us clues as to what kind of rocks lie on Mars.

One of their research projects (in cooperation with Phil Schmidt and David Clark at CSIRO, Australia and just published in the Journal of Geophysical Research) is on the Peculiar Knob Formation in South Australia. These rocks are around 1 billion years old and have a strong magnetic remanence, more than 30 times larger than typically found in basaltic rocks.

"This particular research evolved from looking for an economic mineral deposit," says McEnroe. The mining company had assumed that the rocks in this strongly magnetic area were holding an induced magnetic field and that there would be magnetite buried down below. However, they were puzzled when a different mineral – hematite, came out of the drill core. Had they missed their target, or were their assumptions wrong?

By studying the samples under a powerful microscope and modelling their magnetic properties, McEnroe was able to show that the hematite was responsible for the strong magnetic field and that it was holding a remanent field from around 1 billion years ago. "We could see that the hematite contained small intergrowths that carried the magnetism," says McEnroe, who presented her findings at the 1st EuroMinScI Conference near Nice, France in March this year.

And it turns out that the microstructure of the rock is the key to whether it can hold a remanent magnetization or not. Together with Richard Harrison, a mineral physicist at Cambridge University, UK, and Peter Robinson at NGU, McEnroe has been studying strong remanent magnetic rocks from a variety of places including Scandinavia and the USA.

A study on nearly billion-year-old rocks in Norway showed a remanent magnetic anomaly comparable in scale to those observed on Mars. The remanent magnetic anomaly dominates the local magnetic field to such a degree that more than half the Earth's field is cancelled. It is nearly impossible to use a compass in the area, which cannot point correctly north because of the strong remanent magnetization in the rocks.

What they have found is that rocks containing nanometre scale intergrowths of ilmenite and hematite are better able to cling onto their original magnetization than those without such fine-scale features. "Placing a nanoparticle of ilmenite into the hematite host creates a strong and stable magnetic signal that can survive large changes in temperature and magnetic field over billions of years," explains Harrison.

So can this tell us anything about the rocks on Mars? "These rocks are good analogues for the magnetic rocks we see on Mars because of their strong magnetism and the length of time they have retained this memory," says McEnroe. Certainly this nano-scale microstructure is a plausible candidate for the magnetic rocks on Mars.

However, the rocks on Earth can't answer all our questions. "There is not going to be one mineral or one tectonic setting on Mars. There are going to be different reasons that enhance the signature in different places," says McEnroe. The only way to definitively answer the question is to go and pick up some rocks from Mars.

About the Author
©2006 All rights reserved

More articles
Night sky searchable
Lunar mystery
Gravitational lenses
Benchmark extrasolar planets
Star surface polluted
Gobbling dwarf explodedPrivacy protection software
Charged-molecule discovery
Supergiant spews molecules
Pluto's moon
Monster galaxy pileup
Keck largest exoplanet
Snapshots from deep space
Frigid enceladus
Comet origine of life
Mars magnetic
Source of sunshine
Neutron star
Gaping hole in the universe
Elusive waves in solar corona
Pictures of the heavens
Quotes
Friendship is born at that moment when one person says to another, What! You too? I thought I was the only one! -- C.S. Lewis

For the man who has everything. -- A sign in a Manchester shop above a display for burglar alarms

For the scientific acquisition of knowledge is almost as tedious as the routine acquisition of wealth. — Eric Linklater (1899-1974)


Writers
If you are a writer and want to see your article published at Theallineed.com, just click here to submit.

Info
Today...
In the news...
Which browser do you use the most?
Internet Explorer
Mozilla Firefox
Netscape
Opera
Other
 
Things to ponder
If the front of your car says 'DODGE', do you really need a horn?

Did you know...
Minnesota, the "Land of 10,000 Lakes", actually has 11,842 lakes.

Quote of the day
The entire economy of the Western world is built on things that cause cancer.
From the 1985 movie "Bliss"

Featured article
The Rocks: Sydney's outdoor museum
The Rocks is Sydney's oldest area and is steeped in history and character. One reason is the strict control on development has limited the construction of brash modern buildings.

 
© 2002 - 2007 Lexur