Researchers give name to ancient mystery creatureTheallineed.com
(NC&T/UA) The findings, published recently in the Journal of Paleontology provide the first and only comprehensive account of the creature, named Horolodectes sunae, for the unusual shape of the crowns of the teeth. Horolodectes lived about 60 million years ago, soon after the dinosaurs went extinct, in a period known for its rapid diversification of small mammals. Based on careful examination of tooth and jaw fragments that have been unearthed over the past 30 years, the U of A researchers have now determined Horolodectes was a small fur-bearing animal that measured 10 centimetres in length and, due to its powerful jaws, likely had a strong bite.
Most confounding are the animal's teeth, which resemble in superficial ways those of primitive relatives of ungulates, the group of mammals which includes horses and cows. Despite the link to ungulates, which are traditionally herbivores, Horolodectes was thought to have dined on small insects and grubs.
"It had sharp crests on the teeth which formed blades, indicating it was likely carnivorous," said Craig Scott, a PhD candidate and lead author of the study.
Horolodectes means 'hourglass biter,' in reference to the creature's peculiar hourglass-shaped pre-molars, the teeth between the canine and the molars. The very tall, sharp pre-molars are unlike any others so far discovered in the mammal world. "There is nothing else with teeth quite like it," Craig said.
|The oddly shaped teeth of a prehistoric mystery creature are responsible for its new name. (Photo: U. Alberta)|
The first dental specimens of the creature were unearthed by U of A paleontologists 30 years ago from the banks of the Blindman River. About 10 years ago, more teeth were discovered at a dig site near Drayton Valley and on the banks of the Blindman. But the creature mystified the researchers, who could not positively identify it, and exactly where it fits into the evolutionary ladder is still unknown. Horolodectes remains an enigma to this day.
"It's just too bizarre to place in any group that we've known about previously," said Scott. "It's an open question until we can find more of it. We have no information from a skull or other parts of the body."
This study was supported in part by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council.
This site is no longer updated.
Click this link to have updated paleontology news and articles.
About the Author
©2006 All rights reserved