A physical object defines one last remaining measurement: the kilogram. A cylinder of platinum and iridium sits in a vault under three glass bell jars at the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in the suburbs of Paris.

The international prototype, created in the 1880s and known familiarly as “Le Grand K,” is the standard by which all other kilograms are measured.

But for all the vault-like protections, Le Grand K is vulnerable.

“The big joke is, if someone were to sneeze on the kilogram, there are about 10 fundamental constants that would change, because they’re all tied to its value,” says Jonathan Ellis, an assistant professor of optics and mechanical engineering at the University of Rochester and a specialist in metrology, or the study of measurements.

kilogram weights

And it’s not just a joke. Compared to official replicas held by other laboratories around the globe, Le Grand K is shrinking, albeit by just .05 milligrams in mass.

Established during the French Revolution by the French Academy of Sciences to standardize measurement, the seven basic units of measurement—the kilogram, the meter, the second, the ampere, the mole, the candela, and the kelvin—are now, with the exception of the kilogram, determined by what are called “realized standards,” or procedure-based methods. “Instead of being tied to an artifact, you’re tied to how you perform the measurement,” Ellis says.

He and the members of his lab are involved in an effort to create such a procedure for the kilogram. They’re contributors to a larger project of a group of national laboratories, including the BIPM and others from countries including Denmark, Japan, Germany, and Australia. The lab representing the United States is the National Institute for Standards and Technology.

One effort to define the kilogram in terms of natural properties, begun in 1999, uses the watt balance, a device that defines mass by equating electrical and mechanical power. Ellis focuses his lab on how to make velocity measurements more accurate.

“When you use light to measure things, one of the limiting factors is the air,” he says. “Light has to pass through the air, and air has turbulence.” There are fluctuations in air pressure and in temperature. “For example, the human body will output about 100 watts of power, and so there will be a temperature gradient because you’re standing near the instrument, and that will affect the light that passes through.

“We’re talking about very, very, very small features and small distances”—on the atomic scale—”and so very small perturbations can cause a significant problem.” Even someone talking in the lab creates disturbance, with sound pressure and the exhalation of carbon dioxide.

So Ellis is taking part in an effort to find a way to measure that—and to do so faster than a temperature sensor or a pressure sensor can manage.

The watt balance method isn’t the only one under investigation. There is a competing method, called Avogadro’s Sphere, in which scientists are trying to make a pure silicon sphere that has the number of atoms that would equal the mass of one kilogram.

“Both measurements in and of themselves are accurate, but they don’t conform to each other,” Ellis says. “There’s some discrepancy there, and the international community is trying to figure out where, why, and how.”


This text is published here under a Creative Commons License.
Author: Kathleen McGarvey-University of Rochester
Check here the article’s original source with the exact terms of the license to reproduce it in your own website