In the 2004 film  The Day After Tomorrow climate warming causes an abrupt collapse of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC), which in turn leads to catastrophic events like tornadoes destroying Los Angeles, New York being flooded, and the northern hemisphere freezing.

While the scientific credibility of the film drew criticism from climate scientists, the scenario of an abrupt collapse of the AMOC as a consequence of anthropogenic greenhouse warming was never assessed with a state-of-the-art climate model. Until now.

Using the German climate model ECHAM at the Max-Planck Institute in Hamburg, researchers discovered that, for a period of 20 years, the Earth will cool instead of warm if global warming and a collapse of the AMOC occur simultaneously. Thereafter, global warming continues as if the AMOC never collapsed, but with a globally averaged temperature offset of about 0.8°C.

“The planet Earth recovers from the AMOC collapse in about 40 years when global warming continues at present-day rates, but near the eastern boundary of the North Atlantic (including the British Isles) it takes more than a century before temperature is back to normal,” says Sybren Drijfhout, professor in the ocean and earth science department at the University of Southampton.

quote from The Day After Tomorrow

Interestingly, the effect of atmospheric cooling due to an AMOC collapse is associated with heat flow from the atmosphere into the ocean, which has been witnessed during the climate hiatus of the last 15 years.

“When a similar cooling or reduced heating is caused by volcanic eruptions or decreasing greenhouse emissions the heat flow is reversed, from the ocean into the atmosphere. A similar reversal of energy flow is also visible at the top of the atmosphere. These very different fingerprints in energy flow between atmospheric radiative forcing and internal ocean circulation processes make it possible to attribute the cause of a climate hiatus period.”

However, the study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, suggests the recent period of very weak warming cannot be attributed to one single cause. Most probably El Niño plays a role and possibly also changes in the Southern Ocean due to shifting and increasing westerlies.

“It can be excluded, however, that this hiatus period was solely caused by changes in atmospheric forcing, either due to volcanic eruptions, more aerosols emissions in Asia, or reduced greenhouse gas emissions. Changes in ocean circulation must have played an important role. Natural variations have counteracted the greenhouse effect for a decade or so, but I expect this period is over now.”


This text is published here under a Creative Commons License.
Author: University of Southampton
Check here the article’s original source with the exact terms of the license to reproduce it in your own website